言语暴力，通常也被称为辱骂，是一种常见的暴力行为，包括相对大范围的行为，包括：指责，破坏，言语威胁，秩序，琐碎，不断遗忘，沉默，指责，辱骂，明显批评。言语暴力与其他形式的暴力相容，包括身体暴力和心理暴力。例如，在大多数欺凌行为中，我们确实发现暴力的所有三种变体（以及言语暴力似乎是欺凌暴力的最重要形式 – 没有言语威胁就没有欺凌行为。）与心理暴力一样，提出的问题是在口头暴力方面，什么样的反应可能被认为是合法的。口头威胁是否会让人有回应身体暴力的余地？我们确实在这里找到了两个截然不同的阵营：据一些人说，没有任何口头暴力行为可以证明身体暴力反应的合理性;根据另一个阵营的说法，口头暴力行为可能与身体暴力行为一样具有破坏性，甚至更具破坏性。在大多数犯罪现场，对口头暴力采取合理反应的问题至关重要。如果一个人用武器威胁你，这是否仅仅是一种口头威胁并且是否会授权你进行身体反应？如果是这样，那么威胁是否会对您的任何身体反应产生合理的影响？虽然所有形式的暴力都与文化和教养有关，但口头暴力似乎与非常具体的亚文化有关，即在发言者社区中采用的语言规范。由于其特殊性，似乎口头暴力比其他形式的暴力更容易被限制和消除。因此，例如，如果我们想知道为什么有些人做了并且需要进行身体暴力以及我们如何防止这种情况发生，那么通过强制执行不同的语言行为，似乎可以更容易地控制言语暴力。无论如何，通过行使某种形式的强制手段来处理口头暴力，即使只是在使用语言表达方面的统治。另一方面，口头暴力有时也被视为最被压迫者的一种解放形式。在某种情况下，幽默的运用可能会受到某种形式的言语暴力的影响：从政治上不正确的笑话到简单的嘲笑，幽默似乎是对其他人行使暴力的一种方式。与此同时，幽默是社会抗议活动中最“民主”和温和的工具之一，因为它不需要特别的富裕，并且可以说不会造成任何物理伤害，也不会造成巨大的心理困扰。言语暴力的行使，或许比任何其他形式的暴力行为都要多，要求发言者不断检查对她的言论的反应：人类几乎总是最终相互暴力;只有通过教育自己来试图避免我们的熟人确实发现暴力的行为，以便我们能够和平地生活。
Speech violence, often referred to as abusive, is a common form of violence, including relatively large-scale behaviors, including: accusations, sabotage, verbal threats, order, triviality, constant forgetting, silence, accusations, insults, and obvious criticism. Speech violence is compatible with other forms of violence, including physical and psychological violence. For example, in most bullying behaviors, we do find that all three variants of violence (and verbal violence seem to be the most important form of bullying violence – no bullying if there is no verbal threat.) Like psychological violence, the question is In terms of verbal violence, what kind of reaction may be considered legal. Does the verbal threat give people room to respond to physical violence? We did find two very different camps here: according to some people, no verbal violence can justify the physical violence; according to another camp, verbal violence can be as devastating as physical violence. Sex, even more destructive. At most crime scenes, the issue of a reasonable response to verbal violence is critical. If a person threatens you with a weapon, is this just a verbal threat and will it authorize you to react physically? If so, will the threat have a reasonable impact on any of your physical reactions? While all forms of violence are related to culture and upbringing, verbal violence appears to be related to very specific subcultures, the language norms used in the community of speakers. Because of its particularity, it seems that verbal violence is more likely to be restricted and eliminated than other forms of violence. So, for example, if we want to know why some people do and need physical violence and how we prevent this from happening, it seems that it is easier to control verbal violence by enforcing different language behaviors. In any case, oral violence is dealt with by exercising some form of coercion, even if it is only in the use of language expression. On the other hand, verbal violence is sometimes seen as a form of liberation for the most oppressed. In some cases, the use of humor may be affected by some form of verbal violence: from politically incorrect jokes to simple ridicules, humor seems to be a way of exercising violence against others. At the same time, humor is one of the most “democratic” and moderate tools in social protests, because it does not require special wealth, and it can be said that it will not cause any physical harm, nor will it cause great psychological distress. Speech violence is perhaps more than any other form of violence, requiring speakers to constantly check the response to her comments: humans almost always end up violating each other; only by educating themselves to try to avoid our acquaintances actually finding violence The behavior so that we can live peacefully.