民主和平理论也因未能证明战争与政府类型之间的因果关系,以及无法轻易操纵“民主”和“战争”的定义以证明不存在的趋势而受到批评。 尽管该报告的作者包括了在新民主国家和可疑民主国家之间进行的很小甚至是不流血的战争,但一项2002年的研究认为,民主国家之间发生的战争与非民主国家之间的统计数字一样多。 其他批评家认为,在整个历史中,决定和平或战争的不仅仅是权力的演变,而不仅仅是民主或民主的缺失。 他们特别指出,所谓的“自由民主和平”效应实际上是由于“现实”因素,包括民主政府之间的军事和经济联盟。

英国曼彻斯特政治作业代写:自由民主和平

The theory of democratic peace has also been criticized for failing to prove the causal relationship between war and the type of government, and the inability to easily manipulate the definitions of “democracy” and “war” to prove the non-existence. Although the authors of the report included small or even bloodless wars between new and suspicious democracies, a 2002 study found that war between democracies and non-democratic countries There are as many statistics. Other critics believe that throughout history, it is not just the evolution of power that determines peace or war, not just the absence of democracy or democracy. In particular, they pointed out that the so-called “free democratic peace” effect is actually due to “reality” factors, including military and economic alliances between democratic governments.of��T��\K

发表评论

电子邮件地址不会被公开。 必填项已用*标注